Reviewer Register

Join the JNRT reviewer community and support neurological research quality.

JNRT welcomes reviewers with expertise in neurology, neuroscience, neurotherapeutics, and related fields. Reviewers play a critical role in maintaining evidence quality.

• Recent publications or clinical research experience
• Expertise in neurological disorders or therapeutics
• Commitment to timely and constructive review

• Evaluate methodological rigor and clinical relevance
• Provide clear, actionable feedback
• Maintain confidentiality and disclose conflicts
• Meet review timelines or communicate delays

Reviewers must disclose any financial, institutional, or personal conflicts that could bias the review. If a conflict exists, decline the invitation promptly.

Strong reviews include a brief summary of the manuscript, major concerns, and specific recommendations. Constructive feedback improves the quality of neurological evidence and accelerates decision making.

Reviewers must keep manuscripts confidential, use submitted data only for review, and disclose any conflicts. If you recognize a conflict or competitive overlap, decline the invitation so the editorial office can reassign the manuscript promptly.

JNRT provides structured review templates to help reviewers comment on methods, ethics, and clinical relevance. Using the checklist improves consistency across reviews and reduces revision cycles for authors.

Accurate keywords and methodological details help the editorial office match reviewers with the right manuscripts. Update your profile as your expertise evolves.

• List neurological subspecialties and disorders
• Include methodological strengths and tools
• Note availability and review capacity

Register through ManuscriptZone and create your reviewer profile. A detailed profile improves matching accuracy and review efficiency.

• Register at https://oap.manuscriptzone.net/auth/register
• Select keywords and expertise areas
• Confirm availability and contact details

Reviewers receive guidance, templates, and recognition for their service. Consistent review contributions strengthen the neurological research community.

Typical review timelines are 14 to 21 days depending on manuscript complexity. If you need more time, notify the editorial office so timelines can be adjusted.

Timely reviews support consistent decisions and improve author experience.

• Early access to emerging research
• Recognition certificates for service
• Opportunities to collaborate on special issues
• Professional development in evidence appraisal

Reviewers may be acknowledged annually and can request service certificates for professional records. Consistent service can lead to invitations for editorial roles or special issue collaboration.

Reviewer contributions help maintain the credibility of neurological evidence and improve patient care outcomes.

• Certificates for completed reviews
• Acknowledgment in annual reviewer lists
• Opportunities for reviewer to editor advancement

The editorial office provides guidance on review structure, ethics, and reporting standards. If you need clarification on a manuscript, contact the editorial office for assistance.

• Invitations are matched to expertise and availability
• You can decline reviews when conflicts arise
• Guidance and checklists are provided for new reviewers
• Service is acknowledged annually