International Journal of Thorax - Instructions for Authors
Modern, submission-ready guidance for thoracic and respiratory research with clear compliance checkpoints.
Prepare for Fast, Fair Review
International Journal of Thorax (IJT) publishes clinically relevant research across pulmonology, thoracic surgery, critical care, imaging, and translational respiratory science. This guide explains how to prepare a manuscript that moves smoothly through editorial screening, peer review, and production.
Well-structured submissions help reviewers focus on clinical value, study design, and patient impact. Follow the section standards below, use the quick compliance panel, and submit through your preferred portal for a faster, more predictable review experience.
If you are unsure about scope or study type, contact the editorial office before submission for guidance.
Submit Your Manuscript
Choose the submission route that matches your workflow and institutional requirements.
ManuscriptZone Portal
Full-featured submission and tracking with integrated reviewer communication tools.
Submit via ManuscriptZoneSimple Submission Form
Quick upload for authors who prefer a streamlined, low-friction submission process.
Submit via Simple FormQuick Compliance Panel
- Title page with affiliations, ORCID, funding, and contributions
- Structured abstract with objectives, methods, results, and conclusions
- Ethics approval and informed consent statements when required
- Clinical trial registration number in abstract and methods
- IMRAD structure and continuous line numbering
- Figures at 300 dpi and fully de-identified
- Editable tables with clear titles and units
- Data availability statement with access terms
- Vancouver references with DOI links where possible
- Cover letter confirming exclusivity and preprint disclosure
Quality Signals We Look For
Clinical Relevance and Patient Impact
Describe how findings improve diagnosis, treatment decisions, or outcomes in thoracic and respiratory care. Clear clinical framing helps editors and reviewers assess real-world significance.
Method Transparency and Reproducibility
Provide protocol details, inclusion criteria, statistical plans, and reproducibility safeguards so results can be verified and applied in similar clinical settings.
Ethics, Consent, and Data Stewardship
Include ethics approvals, informed consent statements, and data availability plans that protect patient privacy while enabling responsible reuse.
Reporting Clarity
Use structured headings, precise terminology, and consistent terminology across text, tables, and figures to keep review efficient and production accurate.
Manuscript Preparation Standards
Title Page
AccountabilityThe title page establishes authorship, funding transparency, and ethical accountability. Clear attribution prevents delays during editorial screening and production.
Include group authorship details, clinical consortium names, and corresponding author responsibilities so editorial queries can be resolved quickly. If multiple institutions are involved, confirm the primary site for ethics oversight.
- Full author names, affiliations, and ORCID identifiers
- Corresponding author email, phone, and postal address
- Funding sources, grant numbers, and sponsor roles
- Conflict of interest and author contribution statements
- Ethics approval identifiers and consent statements
Include
- Running title (50 characters max)
- Keywords aligned with indexing
- Trial registry name and ID when applicable
- Preprint disclosure if posted
Abstract
DiscoverabilityUse a structured abstract to help readers and indexers quickly understand the clinical relevance of your work. Match abstract data to the main text and keep results specific.
When reporting diagnostic accuracy, include key performance metrics. For interventional or comparative studies, state the primary endpoint and follow-up duration in clear, concise language.
- Structured sections: Objective, Methods, Results, Conclusion
- State study design, population, and primary outcomes
- Report key numeric findings, effect sizes, or confidence intervals
- Include trial registration number when relevant
Keywords
- Four to six keywords for indexing
- Use disease terms and clinical outcomes
- Include method or modality terms if critical
Main Text
Clinical RigorFollow IMRAD structure and provide enough detail for replication. Clear methodology and statistical reporting reduce reviewer queries and improve confidence.
State primary and secondary outcomes, define adverse event collection, and explain any interim analyses. For observational studies, describe confounder handling and adjustments.
- Define study design, setting, and participant selection
- Describe interventions, comparators, and outcomes
- Report statistical methods and software versions
- State missing data handling and sensitivity analyses
- Discuss limitations and clinical implications
Formatting Snapshot
| Item | Requirement |
|---|---|
| File format | Word (.doc or .docx) |
| Font and spacing | 12 pt, double spaced |
| Line numbers | Continuous |
| Trial registration | Registry ID included |
Figures and Tables
ClarityFigures and tables should communicate results clearly and respect patient confidentiality. Provide editable tables and full legends that explain clinical context.
For imaging studies, include modality, acquisition parameters, and relevant scales. Ensure that labels match the narrative and that tables report absolute numbers along with percentages.
- Images at 300 dpi in TIFF, JPEG, or PNG format
- Remove patient identifiers from imaging and photos
- Include scale bars, labels, and abbreviations
- Upload tables as editable files with units
Figure Requirements
| Element | Standard |
|---|---|
| Resolution | 300 dpi minimum |
| Color mode | RGB |
| Legends | Complete and standalone |
| Tables | Editable and titled |
Supplementary Materials and Data
TransparencySupplementary files strengthen transparency by providing protocols, extended tables, appendices, and analytic code. Ensure all supplemental files are cited in the main text and clearly labeled.
- Supplementary tables and figures referenced in order
- Protocols or checklists for clinical trials and registries
- Analytic code or statistical scripts when possible
- Data dictionaries and variable definitions for datasets
Data Notes
- State de-identification steps for patient data
- Include repository links or access criteria
- Clarify embargo timelines if applicable
References
Citation IntegrityAccurate references speed production and improve discoverability. Use Vancouver style and verify DOI links before submission.
When citing guidelines or clinical trial reports, use the most current version and confirm that trial registry links resolve correctly. Cite datasets and protocols when they inform the analysis.
- Vancouver style with numbered citations
- Include DOI links whenever available
- Cite trial registrations and datasets as needed
- Confirm accuracy for author names and journals
Reference Hygiene
- Match citations to reference list
- Use consistent journal abbreviations
- Include access dates for datasets
Ethics and Consent
Provide IRB or ethics committee approvals for human or animal studies and confirm informed consent or waiver details in the methods section.
Data Availability
State where de-identified data are stored, include repository links or access criteria, and describe any embargoes or restrictions clearly.
Trial Registration
Clinical trials must be registered prior to enrollment. Include the registry name and ID in the abstract and methods.
Submission Workflow
Prepare Core Files
Assemble title page, manuscript, figures, tables, and supplementary files with consistent naming.
Run Compliance Check
Confirm ethics approvals, trial registration, and data availability statements are complete.
Submit Online
Upload files through ManuscriptZone or the Simple Submission Form and include a cover letter.
Respond to Review
Provide point-by-point responses and submit clean and marked revisions when requested.
Editorial Acceptance
After acceptance, confirm final metadata, author details, and any required repository links.
Proof and Publish
Review page proofs carefully, approve corrections, and confirm final publication readiness.
Recommended Reporting Guidelines
Revision and Production Guidance
Responding to reviews: Provide a point-by-point response letter that addresses every comment. Highlight changes in the revised manuscript and explain any recommendations you cannot implement with clear justification.
Language and clarity: Ensure terminology is consistent across the abstract, methods, and results. Revisions should remove ambiguity, clarify outcomes, and align tables and figures with the narrative.
Proofing stage: After acceptance, check page proofs carefully for author names, affiliations, data accuracy, and legend consistency. Corrections should be returned promptly to avoid delays in publication.
Post-publication updates: If you discover errors after publication, contact the editorial office quickly. Corrections and updates are handled transparently to protect the scholarly record.
Author FAQs
Ready to Submit Your Manuscript?
Follow the instructions above to accelerate review and improve acceptance readiness for your thoracic and respiratory research.
Use the submission portals above to start your manuscript review.