Resources for IIIJ Reviewers
IIIJ provides reviewers with guidance to deliver clear, consistent, and constructive evaluations. These resources support review quality across laboratory, clinical, and computational research.
In Vitro
Protocol and assay review guidance
In Vivo
Ethics and reporting standards
In Silico
Model validation and data checks
Guidance for Effective Reviews
Review Template
Structured Feedback- Summary, major issues, and minor comments
- Section specific observations
- Clear revision priorities
Ethics Checklist
Compliance Review- Consent and ethics approvals
- ARRIVE or clinical reporting checks
- Participant safety considerations
Data Review
Transparency- Data availability statement review
- Model validation and reproducibility cues
- Code or pipeline documentation
Communication With Editors
Use confidential notes to alert editors about ethical concerns or significant methodological issues. Clear communication improves decision quality.
Requesting Support
If you need guidance on policy or deadlines, contact [email protected]. The editorial office can provide additional resources.
Key Review Elements
Using Templates
Templates help reviewers provide structured feedback and reduce omissions. If you need a sample review format, request one from the editorial office.
Timeline Extensions
If you need extra time to complete a review, notify the editor as early as possible. Early communication helps maintain fair timelines for authors.
Bias Awareness
Reviewers should focus on evidence and avoid bias related to geography, institution, or career stage. Objective reviews strengthen the credibility of the peer review process and improve equity. Keep feedback focused on the science.
Clarity in Recommendations
When making a recommendation, explain your reasoning and link it to the evidence in the manuscript. Clear recommendations help editors and authors respond effectively. Avoid ambiguous language.
Statistical Review Tips
Verify that sample sizes, statistical tests, and significance thresholds are reported clearly. If analyses are complex, request additional detail or clarification from the authors. Clear statistical reporting supports reproducibility.
Great reviews are structured, fair, and actionable. IIIJ supports reviewers with tools that protect quality and integrity.
Need a Reviewer Resource?
Email [email protected] for templates or additional guidance. We can share sample reports and checklists, including method specific tips. Guidance is available for new reviewers and can be tailored to your domain. Templates can be customized and examples can be shared. We are happy to help with clear, practical resources and quick responses when you need them. We can also provide data reporting checklists.
