International Journal of Aquaculture Research and Development invites high quality submissions in aquaculture production, aquatic animal health, and sustainable farming systems. We welcome original research, reviews, and methods papers that provide validated trials, mechanistic insights, and clear pathways to industry practice.

Our editorial priorities focus on rigor, transparency, and environmental stewardship. Submissions should explain how findings advance sustainable aquaculture and food security.

• Aquaculture nutrition, feed formulation, and feed efficiency
• Hatchery technology, breeding, and genetic improvement
• Aquatic animal health, disease management, and biosecurity
• Water quality management and recirculating aquaculture systems
• Sustainable production systems and environmental impact
• Species biology, growth performance, and welfare
• Aquaculture economics, policy, and value chain analysis
• Innovation in aquaculture engineering and automation

• Short communications reporting high impact findings
• Technical notes on system optimization or disease control
• Perspective articles on aquaculture sustainability and policy

Successful submissions present a clear research question, validated experimental design, and transparent statistical reporting. We value studies that demonstrate reproducibility and relevance to aquaculture practice.

Authors should explain novelty, describe husbandry and environmental controls, and connect findings to production outcomes.

• Transparent husbandry and water quality reporting
• Validation against established benchmarks or controls
• Clear interpretation of growth, health, or environmental outcomes
• Appropriate statistical methods and reporting

Submissions undergo editorial screening for scope fit, study design quality, and data transparency. Qualified manuscripts move to single blind peer review with subject matter experts.

IJARD operates under an open access model to ensure aquaculture research is discoverable and reusable. APCs are applied after acceptance and support peer review, production, and archiving services.

Membership options and affordable APC waivers are available for eligible authors. Contact the editorial office at [email protected] for guidance.

• Scope fit confirmed for aquaculture research
• Husbandry conditions and water quality documented
• Data availability statement included
• Validation results and evaluation metrics reported
• Cover letter explains novelty and relevance

Report stocking densities, water quality parameters, and husbandry conditions so readers can interpret results across production systems.

Include details on species, strain, age, and life stage to support reproducibility and comparisons across studies.

When reporting feed trials, describe diet formulation, feeding schedules, and conversion metrics used to evaluate performance.

If disease challenges are part of the study, specify pathogen strain, exposure protocol, and biosecurity measures applied.

Discuss environmental sustainability implications, including effluent management, resource efficiency, and ecosystem impacts when relevant.

Provide clear descriptions of sampling methods, replication, and statistical models to support robust interpretation.

If selective breeding or genetics are involved, report breeding design, pedigree structure, and selection criteria.

Describe how welfare considerations were addressed, including anesthesia, handling, and mortality monitoring.

When reporting growth performance, include baseline measurements and explain normalization methods.

If trials involve recirculating systems or aquaponics, detail system configuration, filtration, and monitoring protocols.

Explain how climate or seasonal variables may influence results and how they were controlled or measured.

Provide clarity on production scale, such as laboratory, pilot, or commercial, to contextualize applicability.

Discuss limitations such as short trial duration, species-specific constraints, or site-specific conditions.

Include a brief statement on how findings translate to industry practice without overstating conclusions.

If data are restricted, describe access pathways and provide sufficient methodological detail for independent verification.

Early communication with the editorial office can help confirm scope fit and avoid delays during initial screening.

When presenting economic outcomes, clarify assumptions, cost inputs, and pricing scenarios used in analysis.

Report any adverse events or unexpected outcomes to provide a balanced understanding of interventions.

Document acclimation periods and baseline health assessments before trials so reviewers can interpret growth and survival outcomes accurately.

Clarify tank or cage volumes, stocking densities, and flow rates to ensure production performance can be compared across studies.

Describe biosecurity protocols, quarantine steps, and pathogen screening to contextualize health outcomes and mortality reporting.

Include details on water chemistry targets, monitoring instruments, and calibration schedules to support reproducible water quality management.

When reporting feed efficiency, specify feed ingredient sources, pellet size, and storage conditions that may influence performance metrics.

Provide clear definitions of welfare indicators and how they were measured or scored during the study period.

Explain how seasonal variability or site-specific conditions were addressed in experimental design or statistical models.

If using imaging, sensors, or automation systems, describe calibration, data validation, and error mitigation approaches.

For comparative studies, state the rationale for control selection and any historical benchmarks used for interpretation.

Report any regulatory permits, facility accreditations, or animal care protocols relevant to the study.

Include information on water reuse, effluent treatment, and sustainability practices when environmental impacts are assessed.

Describe handling and sampling frequency to clarify potential stress effects on performance or health indicators.

If commercial-scale trials are included, explain how results translate to farm operations and operational constraints.

When reporting survival outcomes, distinguish between disease-related mortality and operational losses where possible.

IJARD is committed to rigorous, transparent publishing in aquaculture research. We emphasize reproducible methods, complete data statements, and ethical compliance across all article types.

The editorial office supports authors, editors, and reviewers with clear guidance and responsive communication. For questions about scope or workflow, contact [email protected].

We encourage continuous improvement in reporting practices and share updates that help the community maintain high standards in aquaculture and fisheries research.