Journal of Human Psychology

Submit Manuscript
Instructions for authors

Instructions for Authors

What the Journal of Human Psychology requires of a manuscript: limits by article type, structure, reporting, declarations, and the checklist to work through before submitting.

JHP ISSN 2644-1101 Structured abstract, 250 words Numbered references Open access · CC BY 4.0

01 · Fit

Fit and article type

Before formatting anything, settle two questions: whether the work is in scope, and which article type it is. The type governs the word limit, the abstract, and the reporting guideline that applies.

The journal publishes research on human psychological processes and behavior. A psychological construct, mechanism, experience or behavioral outcome must be central to the contribution; human participation, a medical dataset or a questionnaire alone does not establish fit. Aims and scope sets out the boundary with worked examples on both sides of it.

The journal’s article types, and what each one is for.
Article typeWhat it is for
Original researchEmpirical studies, basic or applied, with a clear psychological question. Replication and well-supported null findings are eligible.
Review articles and evidence synthesesSystematic and narrative reviews that advance psychological theory or inform practice, policy or program design.
Program evaluationsEvaluations of community, school or workplace interventions, with outcomes, limitations and implementation context reported.
Qualitative and mixed-methods studiesWork that captures lived experience and context, with the coding structure and analytic procedure reported in full.
Short communicationsFocused reports of a single finding, method or instrument where the contribution does not require a full research article.
Editorial and commentary materialCommissioned and editorial contributions on questions within the journal’s remit.
02 · Limits

Limits by article type

Word counts exclude the abstract, references, tables and figure legends.
Article typeWordsAbstractKeywords
Original research4,000–6,500250, structured5–10
Original research reporting an interventional trial4,500–7,000250, structured5–10
Program evaluations4,000–6,500250, structured5–10
Qualitative and mixed-methods studies4,000–6,500250, structured5–10
Review articles and evidence syntheses4,500–8,000250, structured5–10
Short communications2,000–3,000250, structured5–10
Editorial and commentary materialAgreed with the editors when the contribution is commissionedNot required3–6

No fixed numerical limit applies to references, figures, or tables. Include only material necessary to support the work, subject to editorial assessment. Existing word-count, abstract, and keyword limits remain unchanged.

The extra allowance for a trial report exists so a CONSORT-compliant methods and results section fits without compressing the discussion. Where a manuscript exceeds its limit and reducing it would compromise the completeness of the work, write to the editorial office ([email protected]) before submitting to ask about an exception.

Title
25 words maximum
Running head
50 characters maximum
Manuscript file
Microsoft Word, .doc or .docx
Typography
12-point Times New Roman, double-spaced, 1-inch margins
Language
English, used consistently throughout the manuscript
Figure files
TIFF or PNG at 300 DPI or higher
03 · Structure

Required section order

  1. Title page
  2. Abstract
  3. Keywords
  4. Main text
  5. Declarations
  6. References
  7. Tables and figures

Tables and figures are placed at the end of the manuscript file, after the references, each on its own page and each with a title and legend. Figure files are also uploaded separately at full resolution.

Main text for empirical studies

The outline below applies to empirical reports. Describe participants, instruments, statistical procedures and other elements where they apply to the study design.

  • Introduction. The problem, why it matters, what is already established, and the research question or objective this study addresses.
  • Methods. Design, setting, participants and how they were recruited, measures and instruments, procedure, and the analytic approach — in enough detail that a reader in the same subfield could evaluate the inference.
  • Results. The findings, reported for every outcome stated in the methods, including those that were not significant.
  • Discussion. What the findings mean, how they sit against existing evidence, what they imply for practice or policy where that applies, and the limitations — including where the findings do not generalize.
  • Conclusion. What the study contributes, stated no more strongly than the design supports.

Qualitative and mixed-methods reports may use headings appropriate to their methodology. Describe the analytic approach, coding where used, and the researcher’s position in relation to the material. Mixed-methods reports explain each strand and how the findings were integrated.

Reviews and conceptual contributions

Within the existing review and editorial/commentary formats, narrative and conceptual work may organize the main text as an introduction, the evidence base and approach, thematic analysis or argument, discussion of limitations, and conclusion. Explain how sources were selected and evaluated, distinguish established findings from propositions, and address relevant alternative explanations. Participant recruitment, instruments and statistical results are required only when the contribution uses them. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses retain the methods and reporting requirements for their design.

04 · Front matter

Title page, abstract and keywords

Title page

  • Article title, 25 words maximum, naming the population and setting where the study has one.
  • Full author names with affiliations, and ORCID iDs where available.
  • Corresponding author’s mailing address, email and telephone number.
  • Total word count and a running head of 50 characters maximum.

Abstract and keywords

  • Structured abstract, 250 words maximum, under the headings Background, Methods, Results and Conclusion.
  • A review abstract uses the same headings. For systematic reviews, summarize the search strategy under Methods; for narrative or conceptual reviews, summarize the approach to selecting evidence and developing the argument. Results may summarize the synthesis or principal argument rather than new participant data.
  • Five to ten keywords, specific enough to distinguish the work from adjacent studies.
  • The abstract carries no citations, no undefined abbreviations, and no claim the results do not support.

Preparing a manuscript for double-blind review

For double-blind review, remove author names, affiliations, acknowledgments, funding details, institution names, and other identifying information from the reviewer manuscript. Provide identifying information separately in the title-page file or submission form.

Check the manuscript for self-identifying references — “our previous study”, a named local service, a trial registration entry, or document properties carrying an author name.

05 · Reporting

Reporting guidelines and statistics

Every empirical manuscript is reported against the guideline appropriate to its design, and the completed checklist is uploaded with the submission.

Which guideline applies to which design.
GuidelineApplies to
CONSORTRandomized controlled trials, with the flow diagram and the trial registration details
TRENDNon-randomized behavioral and public health intervention studies
STROBEObservational research: cross-sectional, cohort and case-control designs
PRISMASystematic reviews and meta-analyses, with the flow diagram and the protocol registration where one exists
COREQQualitative research using interviews or focus groups
SRQROther qualitative designs, and the qualitative strand of a mixed-methods study
CARECase reports and case series
STARDStudies of diagnostic or screening accuracy, including psychological screening instruments

Statistical reporting

  • Report effect sizes with confidence intervals, not significance alone. Conclusions should reflect the study’s precision, limitations and evidence.
  • State the analysis plan and whether it was set in advance. Where a preregistration exists, cite it; where an analysis was exploratory, say so.
  • Name the software and version used for the analysis.
  • Describe missing data: how much, on which variables, and how it was handled.
  • Report sample size determination. For a study designed to detect an effect, give the power calculation and its assumptions; for a study that used an available sample, say so and address what that means for precision.
  • Report every prespecified outcome, including those that were not significant, and identify any that changed after the study began.
06 · Measures

Psychological measures and instruments

Most of what the journal publishes rests on a measure, so the reporting requirements for instruments are as specific as those for the design.

  • Name and version. Give the full name of each instrument, the version used, the number of items and the response format.
  • Psychometric evidence. Give the evidence supporting its use in the population studied, and the internal consistency observed in this sample. A scale used outside the population it was validated in is reported as such.
  • Translation and adaptation. Where an instrument has been translated or adapted, say so and describe how — forward and back translation, expert review, cognitive interviewing, and any items changed or dropped.
  • Scoring. State how scores were computed, how missing items were handled, and the source of any cut-off applied.
  • Permissions. Where an instrument is under copyright, confirm that permission was obtained for its use and for reproducing any items shown in the manuscript.
  • Instrument development studies report item generation, the sample used for each analytic step, the factor structure with its fit indices, reliability, and any test of measurement invariance across the groups compared.
07 · Display items

Tables, figures and supplementary files

Tables

  • Built with the table tool in Word, never as an image or a tab-aligned block of text.
  • Numbered in order of first mention, each with a descriptive title above it.
  • Every abbreviation defined in a footnote to the table, and every statistic labeled.
  • Readable without the main text.
  • Placed at the end of the manuscript, each on its own page.

Figures

  • TIFF or PNG at 300 DPI or higher, supplied as separate files at full resolution.
  • Numbers, letters and symbols no smaller than 2 mm once the figure is reduced to its printed size.
  • Numbered in order of first mention, each with a legend that states what is plotted and what any error bars represent.
  • Panels in a multi-panel figure labeled A, B, C and referred to by those labels.
  • Legible in grayscale, and not dependent on color alone to carry meaning.

Include the tables and figures the analysis requires, and put additional material in supplementary files rather than in the article. Supplementary files may include study protocols, instruments and item lists, data dictionaries, intervention or training materials, extended analyses, and analytic code. Each is numbered, given a title, and cited at the point in the text where it is relevant.

Material reproduced from another source — a figure, a table, a scale, or an extended quotation — requires written permission from the copyright holder, and the permission is confirmed at submission and the source credited in the caption.

08 · References

References

References are cited by number rather than by author and date, numbered consecutively in the order they first appear in the text, and listed in that order rather than alphabetically. List the first three authors, then et al. for any further authors. Journal titles are abbreviated in their standard form. Authors are responsible for the accuracy of every reference.

Journal article
1. Maslow AH. A theory of human motivation. Psychol Rev. 1943;50(4):370–396.
Journal article with a DOI
2. Author AB, Author CD, Author EF. Title of the article in sentence case. Abbrev J Title. 2024;18(3):211–226. doi:10.1000/abcd.2024.0311
Journal article, more than three authors
3. Author AB, Author CD, Author EF, et al. Title of the article. Abbrev J Title. 2023;41(7):1104–1119.
Book
4. Author AB, Author CD, editors. Title of the book. 2nd ed. New York: Publisher Name; 2019.
Chapter in an edited book
5. Author AB. Title of the chapter. In: Editor CD, editor. Title of the book. Vol 4. London: Publisher Name; 2021. p. 71–81.
Webpage or online report
6. Organization Name. Title of the page or report [Internet]. Place: Organization Name; 2024 [cited 2026 Sep 10]. Available from: https://example.org/path-to-the-page
Dataset
7. Author AB, Author CD. Title of the dataset [dataset]. Repository Name; 2025. doi:10.1000/repo.2025.0142
Preprint
8. Author AB, Author CD. Title of the preprint [preprint]. Preprint Server; 2025 Mar 14. doi:10.1000/preprint.2025.0068
Trial registration
9. Title of the registered trial. Registry Name identifier: REG12345678. Registered 2024 Jan 15. Available from: https://example-registry.org/study/REG12345678
Thesis or dissertation
10. Author AB. Title of the thesis [dissertation]. City: University Name; 2023.
Psychological instrument or manual
11. Author AB. Name of the scale: administration and scoring manual. 3rd ed. City: Publisher Name; 2018.

Cite the version you consulted. A preprint that has since been published is cited in its published form, and a reference to a retracted article says so.

09 · Declarations

Declarations

Every manuscript carries a declarations section. Each item below is required, including where there is nothing to declare.

  1. Ethical approval

    Name the approving Institutional Review Board or ethics committee and give the reference number, or state the documented basis on which your institution determined that review was not required. Research involving human participants must be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

  2. Informed consent

    Confirm that informed consent was obtained, and describe how where the circumstances made it a more demanding matter. Where an individual could be identified from the material published, written consent for publication is required and the manuscript states that it was obtained.

  3. Trial registration

    Interventional clinical trials must be registered in an accepted public trial registry at or before the first participant provides consent for enrollment. The registry name, registration number, and registration date must be reported in the manuscript.

  4. Data availability

    Every empirical research manuscript must include a data-availability statement. It says where the data are, on what terms they can be reached, and, where they cannot be shared, why.

  5. Competing interests

    Disclose financial or personal relationships that could influence the research, including employment, consultancy, grants, patents, paid expert testimony, and relationships with organizations with an interest in the findings.

  6. Funding

    Name all funding with grant numbers where they exist, and state what part the funder played in design, analysis, interpretation or the decision to publish.

  7. Author contributions

    State what each author did. Authorship follows the ICMJE recommendations, and contributions that fall short of authorship are acknowledged with the contributor’s permission.

  8. Use of AI

    AI tools cannot be authors. Where an AI tool has been used in preparing the manuscript, disclose its use; the authors remain accountable for the accuracy, originality and integrity of everything submitted.

10 · Review

Review, revision and publication

Single-blind by default; double-blind review is available on request.

All submissions undergo initial editorial screening. Manuscripts that meet the journal’s scope and minimum requirements proceed to independent peer review. Manuscripts that proceed to external peer review are normally evaluated by at least two independent subject-matter experts. Editorial decisions are based on scope, scientific quality, methodological rigor, ethical compliance, reporting quality, and relevance to the journal.

A decision may be accept, minor revision, major revision, or reject. When revisions are requested, submit a point-by-point response alongside a revised manuscript with the changes marked, and where you disagree with a reviewer, say so and give the reason rather than leaving the point unanswered.

After acceptance the manuscript is copyedited and typeset, and proofs are sent to the corresponding author for approval. Corrections at proof stage are for errors, not for new material; substantive additions require a further editorial decision. The article then publishes with a Crossref DOI under the prefix 10.14302, open access under CC BY 4.0, with the authors retaining copyright.

Authors are asked to return proof corrections promptly, since publication waits on them. Editorial and production periods are targets rather than commitments, and are not published as figures.

11 · Checklist

Before you submit

  1. The work is in scope, and you can say which psychological question it answers.
  2. The article type is chosen and the manuscript is inside its word limit.
  3. Structured abstract of 250 words or fewer, under Background, Methods, Results and Conclusion.
  4. Five to ten keywords.
  5. Title of 25 words or fewer; running head of 50 characters or fewer.
  6. Sections in the required order, with tables and figures after the references.
  7. Every instrument named, with its version and the psychometric evidence for the population studied.
  8. The reporting checklist for your design completed and uploaded.
  9. Effect sizes with confidence intervals, and every prespecified outcome reported.
  10. Figures as separate TIFF or PNG files at 300 DPI or higher.
  11. References numbered in order of citation, in the journal’s format.
  12. All eight declarations present, including any that have nothing to declare.
  13. Permissions obtained for any reproduced material, including copyrighted instruments.
  14. If you are requesting double-blind review, the reviewer manuscript carries no identifying information.
  15. Cover letter stating what the study adds and why it fits the journal.
  16. One submission route chosen. Authors must use only one submission route for the same manuscript.

Where to submit

  • Primary route. ManuscriptZone — the journal’s submission system, and the route that gives an author a record of the manuscript’s progress through review and revision.
  • Alternative route. Manuscript submission form — a single page with no account to set up, suited to a straightforward manuscript. The link opens the form with Human Psychology already selected.
  • Assisted route. [email protected] — for an author who cannot use either route above.

Each route leads to the same screening, the same reviewers and the same decision standards. The submit a manuscript page describes what each one suits.

When the manuscript is ready

Submit through ManuscriptZone

Work through the checklist above first. Questions about a requirement, or a request for a length exception, go to the editorial office at [email protected] before submission rather than after it.

Journal of Human Psychology (JHP) · ISSN 2644-1101 · Crossref DOI prefix 10.14302 · Published by Open Access Pub · Content licensed CC BY 4.0, authors retain copyright

Menu