Editors receive templates, checklists, and guidance for ethical screening and reviewer selection.

Decision letter templates support consistent tone and clear feedback for authors.

Policies are updated regularly to align with evolving standards in leukemia research.

Resources include decision templates and ethics checklists.

Resources include decision templates and ethical screening checklists.

Editors can request support for complex submissions.

Resource packs include reviewer invitation templates and decision aids.

Training modules cover conflict management and appeal handling.

Guides summarize data sharing and ethics requirements.

Resources include checklists for rapid screening.

Guides support handling of appeals and author disputes.

Templates provide standardized decision outcomes.

Resource packs include reviewer onboarding guidance.

Editors can request training on ethics or data integrity reviews.

Resources include sample reviewer invitations and reminders.

Quick reference guides summarize decision pathways.

Support is available for handling appeals or disputes.

Resources include checklists for scope fit and ethics screening.

Guides outline best practices for reviewer selection.

Templates help standardize communication with authors.

Training materials support consistent editorial decisions.

Editors receive guidance on handling appeals and complaints.

Resources outline best practices for transparent decisions.

Support is available for urgent or complex submissions.

Resources include templates for revision requests and decisions.

Guides support consistent communication with authors and reviewers.

Editors can request additional training for complex cases.

Resources include checklists for plagiarism and ethics screening.

Guides outline communication standards for revisions.

Templates support consistent acceptance and rejection letters.

Resources include guidance on reviewer conflict management.

Editors can access best-practice summaries for decision making.

Templates provide consistent language for revision requests.

Resources include checklists for methodological screening.

Guides outline steps for handling appeals efficiently.

Resources include sample communications for revisions.

Guides support consistency in reviewer invitations.

Resources include reference guides for decision workflows.

Editors can request assistance from the editorial office for complex or sensitive submissions.

Training materials cover conflict management, appeals, and data integrity reviews.