• 300 to 500 word summary of the theme
• Guest editor bios and affiliations
• Draft call for papers and topic list
• Estimated submission volume and timeline
• Funding or sponsorship details if applicable

Proposals should explain how the theme advances addiction research and why the topic is timely for clinicians, researchers, and policy teams.

Submit proposals through the special issue form or email the editorial office with a complete proposal package.

Approved issues receive journal support for promotion, review coordination, and publication scheduling. Guest editors receive templates for calls for papers and decision letters.

Guest editors should provide periodic updates on outreach progress and expected submissions.

Guest editors should invite submissions with robust methodology and transparent reporting. The journal maintains consistent peer review standards across all special issues.

Guest editors should outline outreach timelines, reviewer recruitment plans, and expected submission volumes. Clear communication keeps the issue on schedule.

The editorial team will confirm acceptance, request revisions to the proposal if needed, or provide feedback for resubmission. Approved proposals move into launch planning with defined milestones.

Combine proposal materials into a single document when possible to streamline review. Include clear section headings and contact details for the lead guest editor.

• Draft call for papers with topic list
• Guest editor bios and affiliations
• Estimated timeline with milestones
• Planned outreach channels

Successful proposals include a focused scope, an engaged guest editor team, and a plan to attract submissions from diverse regions and disciplines.

The editorial office aims to acknowledge proposals promptly and will provide feedback or next steps once the initial review is complete.

Proposals that include a realistic review timeline and a clear plan for reviewer recruitment are more likely to move forward quickly.

Clear milestones for submission, review, and publication improve planning and help maintain quality standards.

Well defined scope and topic boundaries improve reviewer matching and author guidance.

Focused proposals help maintain consistent review standards.

Clear scope also helps attract the right submissions.

This supports a smooth editorial workflow.