• Current affiliation and contact details
• Areas of expertise and methodological skills
• Recent publications or clinical experience
• Availability and preferred review load

• Addiction medicine and clinical treatment
• Epidemiology and population health
• Behavioral interventions and prevention
• Neurobiology and pharmacology
• Policy analysis and health economics

Reviewers should respond promptly to invitations and complete reviews within agreed timelines.

Reviewers are expected to provide constructive, unbiased assessments and to disclose any conflicts of interest.

Reviewer profiles are used to match manuscripts by topic and methodology. Updated profiles reduce delays and ensure balanced reviewer selection.

Update your profile annually or when research focus changes so invitations match your expertise and availability.

Accurate profiles support fair workload distribution and improve reviewer satisfaction.

Let the editorial office know your preferred review load and typical turnaround time. This helps maintain a predictable review schedule for authors.

Clear preferences help the editorial office balance reviewer assignments across topics and time zones.

• Primary and secondary subject areas
• Methodological expertise and tools
• Recent publications or clinical experience
• Preferred review timelines

Complete profiles improve reviewer matching and reduce the time from submission to first decision.

Up to date profiles help ensure invitations match your expertise and availability.

Reviewers should disclose conflicts promptly and decline assignments that overlap with close collaborators or competing interests.

Accurate availability helps the editorial office manage review timelines effectively.

Up to date contact information ensures invitations reach you quickly and reduces review delays.

Clear availability helps maintain predictable decision timelines for authors.

Consistent engagement improves the overall review timeline.

This helps maintain fair turnaround targets.

It also improves reviewer satisfaction.

Clear expectations support efficient reviews.

This benefits authors and reviewers.

Consistent participation improves editorial planning.

It improves turnaround time.