Reviewer Resources
Tools and guidelines supporting Nephrology Advances reviewers in evaluating kidney research submissions effectively.
Review Support Center
Resources to help reviewers provide thorough, constructive evaluations of nephrology and kidney research manuscripts.
Our evaluation framework helps reviewers provide consistent, high-quality assessments addressing key aspects of kidney research manuscripts.
Evaluation Criteria
Structured criteria covering scientific validity, methodology, clinical relevance, and presentation quality for nephrology research.
Report Templates
Standardized formats ensuring comprehensive feedback addressing all essential aspects of kidney manuscripts.
Ethics Guidance
Guidelines for identifying ethical concerns, conflicts of interest, and research integrity issues in nephrology studies.
Reviewers should verify compliance with appropriate reporting guidelines for clinical and kidney research studies.
- CONSORT for randomized trials evaluating nephrology interventions and treatments
- PRISMA for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of kidney literature
- STROBE for observational studies of kidney disease outcomes and risk factors
- STARD for diagnostic accuracy studies of renal biomarkers and tests
Quality reviews: Focus on constructive feedback that helps authors improve their nephrology research. Avoid purely critical comments without actionable suggestions.
Effective reviews balance thoroughness with efficiency. Focus on substantive scientific issues while noting presentation concerns. Prioritize feedback on methodology and clinical validity over minor stylistic matters.
Access Reviewer Portal
Log in to manage your nephrology review assignments and access resources.
Reviewer Login
