01
Thematic Rationale
Explain why the topic is timely and how it advances MS research or clinical practice.
Proposed Special Issue
Propose a Special Issue with Strong Scientific and Operational Value
Build focused collections that address timely priorities in MS and related disorders.
JSC welcomes special issue proposals that pair scientific importance with realistic execution plans. Proposals should define thematic boundaries, expected manuscript quality, and timeline governance from invitation to publication.
RigorousReview standards
FastPublication process
GlobalResearch community
OpenAccess publication
What Makes a Special-Issue Proposal Strong
High-performing proposals balance thematic relevance with practical editorial feasibility.
02
Operational Feasibility
Provide realistic projections for submissions, review capacity, and decision timelines.
03
Governance Controls
Define quality gates and escalation pathways for complex or borderline manuscripts.
How to Build an Executable Proposal Package
Define quality thresholds, reviewer capacity assumptions, and timeline controls before submission.
Theme Rationale Strength
In Proposed Special Issue workflows, Theme Rationale Strength improves operational clarity for special issue proposal planning for MS research themes. It also supports continuity from screening through production transfer.
Issue Scope Boundaries
Issue Scope Boundaries strengthens methodological traceability in Proposed Special Issue for special issue proposal planning for MS research themes. Teams using this approach early tend to move through review with fewer delays.
Guest Editor Governance
Consistent Guest Editor Governance practice increases review reliability in Proposed Special Issue for special issue proposal planning for MS research themes. It supports fair handling across submissions while preserving scientific rigor.
Reviewer Capacity Planning
Reviewer Capacity Planning helps editors and reviewers keep decisions proportionate in Proposed Special Issue for special issue proposal planning for MS research themes. The outcome is clearer reviewer guidance and stronger editorial confidence.
Collection Quality Thresholds
When Collection Quality Thresholds is explicit, Proposed Special Issue performance improves for special issue proposal planning for MS research themes. It protects quality standards without adding unnecessary workflow complexity.
Timeline Feasibility Checks
Timeline Feasibility Checks reduces interpretive ambiguity and supports cleaner communication in Proposed Special Issue for special issue proposal planning for MS research themes. This usually reduces avoidable revision rounds and improves publication readiness.
Cross-Article Coherence
Cross-Article Coherence creates stronger process control in Proposed Special Issue for special issue proposal planning for MS research themes. This lowers late-stage correction risk and improves long-term discoverability quality.
Additional Practical Guidance for Proposed Special Issue
The controls below convert policy expectations into repeatable operating behavior for special issue proposal planning for MS research themes.
Collection Workflow Stability
Collection Workflow Stability should be applied as a recurring checkpoint for special issue proposal planning for MS research themes. It improves speed without reducing evidence standards.
Timeline Governance Control
A disciplined Timeline Governance Control routine improves handling reliability for special issue proposal planning for MS research themes. This reduces rework and supports cleaner production handoff.
Theme Consistency Assurance
Theme Consistency Assurance is most effective when applied before final decisions in special issue proposal planning for MS research themes. It also improves consistency between first-round and re-review assessments.
Strong special-issue concepts combine scientific urgency with operational realism.
Theme value alone is insufficient without clear execution controls and timeline planning.
Submit a Special-Issue Proposal
Send your concept note and workflow plan to [email protected] for editorial consideration.
