Reviewer Register
Register to review submissions for IJIP.
Journal at a Glance
ISSN: 2690-4837
DOI Prefix: 10.14302/issn.2690-4837
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer reviewed open access journal
Scope Alignment
Infection prevention, healthcare epidemiology, antimicrobial stewardship, outbreak response, surveillance systems, vaccine policy, WASH, environmental hygiene, and One Health implementation science. We prioritize actionable evidence and measurable impact.
Publishing Model
Open access, single blind peer review, and rapid publication after acceptance and production checks. Metadata validation and DOI registration are included.
IJIP seeks reviewers with expertise in infection prevention, healthcare epidemiology, microbiology, or related public health sciences. Reviewers support timely, high quality assessments of manuscripts.
- Healthcare-associated infection prevention
- Antimicrobial stewardship and resistance
- Outbreak response and surveillance systems
- Environmental hygiene and sterilization
- Implementation science and behavior change
- Provide objective, constructive feedback
- Complete reviews within agreed timelines
- Disclose conflicts of interest promptly
- Maintain confidentiality and ethical standards
Register
Complete the reviewer registration form: https://oap.manuscriptzone.net/auth/register.
Profile
List expertise areas and keywords.
Invitation
Receive review invitations based on match.
Review
Submit timely, constructive reports.
- Assess clarity of infection outcomes and case definitions.
- Verify methodological rigor and appropriate statistical analysis.
- Check adherence to reporting guidelines such as CONSORT or STROBE.
- Comment on public health relevance and translational impact.
- Review data availability and reproducibility statements.
- Confirm ethical approvals and privacy disclosures.
- Provide constructive feedback and prioritize major issues.
- Indicate whether revisions can be addressed within the stated timeline.
- Check that surveillance methods and denominators are clearly defined.
- Assess whether intervention fidelity is reported.
- Evaluate whether conclusions overstate clinical implications.
- Check consistency between tables, figures, and text.
- Assess whether outbreak timelines and response steps are clear.
- Check that antimicrobial stewardship interventions are described precisely.
- Evaluate statistical reporting of effect sizes and confidence intervals.
- Confirm data limitations and missing data handling are disclosed.
- Assess whether results generalize to similar IPC settings.
- Verify that patient safety implications are discussed responsibly.
- Comment on clarity of intervention components and implementation context.
- Review whether ethical approvals match the described population.
- Check adherence to data sharing and repository requirements.
- Ensure that key abbreviations are defined and used consistently.
- Assess alignment between stated objectives and reported outcomes.
IJIP is committed to rigorous, transparent publishing in infection prevention and control. We emphasize reproducible surveillance methods, clear reporting of case definitions, and ethical compliance across all article types.
The editorial office supports authors, editors, and reviewers with clear guidance and responsive communication. For questions about scope or workflow, contact [email protected].
We encourage continuous improvement in reporting practices and share updates that help the community maintain high standards in infection prevention science and implementation.
Join the Reviewer Community
Help maintain rigorous standards for infection prevention research.