Journal of Evolutionary Science

Journal of Evolutionary Science

Journal of Evolutionary Science – Reviewer Register

Open Access & Peer-Reviewed

Submit Manuscript

Reviewer Register

Register to review submissions for JES.

Expertise MatchReview manuscripts in your domain.
Professional ServiceSupport open access research.
Flexible CommitmentAccept reviews as available.
RecognitionAcknowledgement of reviewer service.

Journal at a Glance

ISSN: 2689-4602
DOI Prefix: 10.14302/issn.2689-4602
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer reviewed open access journal

Scope Alignment

Evolutionary biology, phylogenetics, population genetics, macroevolution, molecular evolution, evolutionary ecology, paleobiology, evo-devo, comparative genomics, and biodiversity science. We prioritize mechanistic insight and robust comparative methods.

Publishing Model

Open access, single blind peer review, and rapid publication after acceptance and production checks. Metadata validation, DOI registration, and data transparency support are included.

Register as a Reviewer

JES seeks reviewers with expertise in evolutionary biology, genetics, ecology, or related life sciences. Reviewers support timely, high quality assessments of manuscripts.

Areas of Expertise
  • Phylogenetics and comparative genomics
  • Population genetics and demographic modeling
  • Macroevolution and diversification
  • Evolutionary ecology and adaptation
  • Paleobiology and fossil calibration
Reviewer Commitment
  • Provide objective, constructive feedback
  • Complete reviews within agreed timelines
  • Disclose conflicts of interest promptly
  • Maintain confidentiality and ethical standards
Registration Steps
1

Register

Complete the reviewer registration form: https://oap.manuscriptzone.net/auth/register.

2

Profile

List expertise areas and keywords.

3

Invitation

Receive review invitations based on match.

4

Review

Submit timely, constructive reports.

Practical Guidance
  • Assess clarity of evolutionary questions and hypotheses.
  • Verify methodological rigor and appropriate statistical analysis.
  • Check adherence to reporting guidelines for evolutionary studies.
  • Comment on theoretical contribution and field relevance.
  • Review data availability and reproducibility statements.
  • Confirm ethical approvals and field permits.
  • Provide constructive feedback and prioritize major issues.
  • Indicate whether revisions can be addressed within the stated timeline.
  • Check that sampling methods and taxon coverage are clearly defined.
  • Assess whether model assumptions are reported and justified.
  • Evaluate whether conclusions overstate evolutionary implications.
  • Check consistency between tables, figures, and text.
  • Assess whether calibration points and priors are described clearly.
  • Check that comparative methods match study design.
  • Evaluate statistical reporting of effect sizes and confidence intervals.
  • Confirm data limitations and missing data handling are disclosed.
  • Assess whether results generalize to related taxa or regions.
  • Verify that specimen provenance is documented where required.
  • Comment on clarity of trait measurements and data coding.
  • Review whether ethical approvals match the described sampling.
  • Check adherence to data sharing and repository requirements.
  • Ensure that key abbreviations are defined and used consistently.
  • Assess alignment between stated objectives and reported outcomes.
JES Commitment

JES is committed to rigorous, transparent publishing in evolutionary science. We emphasize reproducible phylogenetic and population genetic analyses, clear reporting of model assumptions, and ethical compliance in field and laboratory research.

The editorial office supports authors, editors, and reviewers with clear guidance and responsive communication. For questions about scope or workflow, contact [email protected].

We encourage open data, code sharing, and careful documentation of specimens and sequences to support replication and long-term reuse across the evolutionary biology community.

Join the Reviewer Community

Help maintain rigorous standards for evolutionary research.