Reviewer Register
Register to review submissions for JBD.
Journal at a Glance
ISSN: 2374-9431
DOI Prefix: 10.14302/issn.2374-9431
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer reviewed open access journal
Scope Alignment
Bioinformatics, computational genomics, multi-omics integration, systems biology, clinical informatics, and data driven insights for diabetes and metabolic disease. We prioritize reproducible analytics.
Publishing Model
Open access, single blind peer review, and rapid publication after acceptance and production checks. Metadata validation and DOI registration are included.
JBD seeks reviewers with expertise in bioinformatics, diabetes research, systems biology, or clinical data science. Reviewers support timely, high quality assessments of manuscripts.
- Genomics, transcriptomics, and epigenomics
- Proteomics and metabolomics
- Machine learning and predictive modeling
- Clinical informatics and real world data
- Digital health and wearable analytics
- Provide objective, constructive feedback
- Complete reviews within agreed timelines
- Disclose conflicts of interest promptly
- Maintain confidentiality and ethical standards
Register
Complete the reviewer registration form: https://oap.manuscriptzone.net/auth/register.
Profile
List expertise areas and keywords.
Invitation
Receive review invitations based on match.
Review
Submit timely, constructive reports.
- Evaluate whether datasets are appropriate for the research question.
- Check that preprocessing steps are described with enough detail.
- Assess whether model validation uses independent or held out data.
- Review clinical relevance and avoid overstated conclusions.
- Recommend clarifications for diabetes phenotype definitions.
- Verify that statistical tests and metrics are appropriate.
- Note missing citations or key prior work.
- Check that code availability is clear or explained.
- Assess data privacy and ethical compliance statements.
- Ensure figures and tables are interpretable and labeled.
- Flag potential data leakage or overfitting issues.
- Suggest additional analyses or sensitivity checks when needed.
- Evaluate reproducibility based on documentation provided.
- Comment on the clarity of computational workflow descriptions.
- Encourage clear reporting of cohort demographics.
- Check whether limitations are acknowledged and reasonable.
- Confirm that novelty is well supported by the evidence.
- Provide balanced feedback with strengths and actionable improvements.
- Check whether cohort sizes are adequate for the analysis performed.
- Assess whether external validation claims are supported by evidence.
- Review calibration plots or error analyses when available.
- Recommend clearer reporting of preprocessing and feature engineering.
- Confirm that ethical approvals are described for clinical data use.
- Suggest improvements to data visualization clarity.
JBD is committed to rigorous, transparent publishing in bioinformatics and diabetes research. We emphasize reproducible computational methods, clear data provenance, and ethical compliance across all article types.
The editorial office supports authors, editors, and reviewers with clear guidance and responsive communication. For questions about scope or workflow, contact [email protected].
We encourage continuous improvement in reporting practices and share updates that help the community maintain high standards in computational and translational diabetes research.
Join the Reviewer Community
Help maintain rigorous standards for diabetes bioinformatics research.