Open Access Pub publishes peer-reviewed, free-to-read open-access articles. Showing
articles matching NSAID — open any to read the full text,
or download the PDF or XML.
Sep 2022 DOI 10.14302/issn.2641-4538.jphi-22-4238
The safety of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors has been tested in patients who had cross-reactive hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). However, these studies have been mainly done before the current classification of NSAID hypersensitivity and cross-reaction between COX-2 inhibitors has been rarely reported.We aimed to assess tolerability of COX-2 inhibitors and to evaluate the cross-reactivity between them in cross-reactive phenotype of NSAID hypersensitivity. The diagnosis was based on clinical features, reliable history of HSRs to at least two chemically different NSAIDs, and/or positive provocation tests with implicated NSAIDs in 151 patients. Single-blind, oral challenges with 1/4 and 3/4 divided doses of placebo, nimesulide, meloxicam, and celecoxib, as COX-2 inhibitors, were performed. The most common cross-reactive phenotype was NSAID-induced urticaria/angioedema (56.3%). Positive reactions to meloxicam, nimesulide, and celecoxib challenges were observed in 23/140 (16.4%), 7/33 (21.2%), and none of six patients, respectively. Overall, 24 patients were tested with two, one was tested with three COX-2 inhibitors. Six (31.6%) of 19 patients with meloxicam intolerance reacted to nimesulide provocation. Nimesulide, meloxicam, and celecoxib appeared safe alternatives in cross-reactive phenotypes of NSAID hypersensitivity. Although celecoxib has the most favorable tolerability, cross-reactivity among COX-2 inhibitors seems to be possible.
Nov 2020 DOI 10.14302/issn.2470-5020.jnrt-20-3596
Background Reversible posterior encephalopathy syndrome (RPE) is a clinical and radiological entity characterized by the acute or subacute fitting of symptoms covering headache, vomiting, visual disturbances, seizures and impairment of consciousness. The pathophysiology of RPE syndrome is poorly described. RPE syndrome is characterized by a reversible cerebral edema of often posterior topography in magnetic resonance imagery (MRI). Cases Presentation We consider RPE syndrome four cases under various conditions that are known as airplane flight, hypertension, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication, pregnancy and oldness with several pathologies. The RPE was described with several symptoms like headaches, vomiting, focal motor deficit, paresthesia, seizures, disorders of consciousness and photophobia. The imagery findings were varying from cortical hypersignals in Flair sequences to edema of both cortex and sub cortex. The outcome was good with a complete regression of symptoms and imagery lesions. Conclusion The pathophysiological mechanism of RPE syndrome remains unknown. High blood pressure, renal failure and drugs (anti-depressants, NSAIDs, immunosuppressants) are the most etiological factors. The diagnosis is based on clinical arguments and brain MRI. The main location is posterior. The clinical outcome was good with all the patients in our study, no recurrence was noted.
Jul 2016 DOI 10.14302/issn.2574-4526.jddd-16-1203
Background: Iron deficiency is a common reason for referral to a gastroenterologist. Objective: To identify predictors of colorectal cancer in patients referred to a gastroenterologist for iron deficiency. Methods: This was a retrospective review of consecutive patients referred to one of two gastroenterologists for assessment of iron deficiency. The office files and electronic health records were reviewed for all patients. Clinical data, such as hemoglobin level, and clinical symptoms were recorded. The final diagnosis was that of the attending gastroenterologist. Variables associated with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer by univariate analysis were entered into a multivariate logistic regression model to identify variables independently associated with the diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Results: Two hundred and seventy eight patients were included in this study. One hundred and fifty-eight (56.8%) were female. Mean age was 60.7 years (± 16.7 years). The most common causes of iron deficiency were: menorrhagia 16.2%, colorectal cancer 14%, use of aspirin or non-steroidal agents 11.2% and regular blood donation 7.2%. In 11.5% of patients, no cause was found. In univariate analysis, lower hemoglobin, greater age, shorter duration of iron deficiency, weight loss, symptoms from anemia and NSAID use were associated with colorectal cancer. In multivariate analysis, only older age (OR=1.06; 95% CI 1.04-1.09) and symptoms from anemia (OR=2.19; 95% CI 1.20-4.0) were independently associated with colorectal cancer. Conclusions: Colorectal cancer was found in 14% of patients referred to a gastroenterologist because of iron deficiency. Older age, and symptomatic anemia may help predict a diagnosis of colorectal cancer.
Jan 2015 DOI 10.14302/issn.2471-7061.jcrc-14-394
This review synthesizes evidence on NSAIDs and colorectal cancer prevention. It balances chemopreventive efficacy against gastrointestinal and cardiovascular risks, and considers selective COX‑2 inhibitors, dosing, and candidate populations for risk‑benefit.